Natural gas company goes to great lengths to avoid saying the word ‘pipeline’

[ad_1]

Pipelines might be going the way of toilets, death, and sex — that is, best talked about discreetly. Just as ordinary folks might use a euphemism like “the birds and the bees,” a natural gas company is now awkwardly calling its proposed pipeline “an infrastructure.” No, really.

The proposed 12-mile pipeline, officially called the “Greenville County Reliability Project,” is meant to bring more natural gas to the growing population near Greenville County, South Carolina. Local environmentalists argue that the pipeline, proposed by a subsidiary of Duke Energy called Piedmont Natural Gas, is unnecessary. Duke Energy responded with a news release touting the community’s role in determining the pipeline’s route — but without any mention of the actual word “pipeline.”

Instead, there is plenty of discussion of a “new infrastructure project” and various “routes.” Pursuing the project’s site, you have to scroll down to the FAQ to find the p-word, as Politico pointed out. A page about construction includes some creative but not necessarily grammatically correct turns of phrase, perhaps to avoid the word “pipeline”:

Heavy equipment – such as excavators, cranes, rough terrain forklifts, track hoes, dump trucks, side booms and welding equipment – is often necessary to construct a large natural gas infrastructure. While construction of an infrastructure can take months, this equipment and associated construction on individual properties is much shorter in duration. [emphasis added]

Pipeline projects have become the subject of many fervent protests and ensuing legal battles over the last decade, from the Dakota Access pipeline to the Keystone XL expansion. Opponents often cite damage to ecosystems, potential water contamination, and the climate costs of pursuing further fossil fuel infrastructure instead of developing a cleaner grid. These efforts have managed to sink some projects, including Duke and Dominion Energy’s Atlantic Coast Pipeline intended to carry natural gas across Appalachia, which was canceled last summer because of delays and ballooning legal costs. Considering this contentious history, it’s conceivable that companies may want to avoid the word “pipeline” to try to fly under the radar of environmental activists.

A spokesperson for Piedmont Natural Gas, however, cites a different reason for the news release’s linguistic gymnastics. “The word infrastructure is simply a way to indicate that a project includes MORE than pipe,” Jennifer Sharpe said in an email to Grist. “It also includes regulator facilities, control systems, system markers, corrosion coating, AC mitigation, etc. Calling it just a pipeline doesn’t provide an accurate description of the utility infrastructure we build.” Sharpe noted that “infrastructure” is a common term used by utilities.

Oil and gas companies have a long history of using spin to improve their reputation. The oil company BP, for example, rebranded from British Petroleum to the sustainable-sounding “Beyond Petroleum” in the early 2000s. Other messaging tweaks have been more subtle. At the same time that delegates gathered to meet in Glasgow, Scotland, for the United Nations’ international climate negotiations, BP and ExxonMobil began painting themselves as part of the solution on social media. Despite tweeting about a “lower carbon future” and touting renewable and electric vehicle investments, these companies’ spending on low-carbon projects is dwarfed by their spending on oil and gas.

There’s some evidence that public opinion may be souring on fossil fuels. Last year, the CEO of BP admitted that oil was becoming “socially challenged” and that the company was in danger of losing staff and finding it harder to recruit new hires. A recent analysis from the Oxford English Dictionary found that the phrase “fossil fuels” was being used alongside negative words like “divestment” and “phasing out” more frequently than in the past. Natural gas has the best reputation among the fossil fuels: 76 percent of Americans view it favorably, much more than support oil (51 percent) or coal (39 percent).

To be fair, it’s not only fossil fuels that are getting new names to avoid a rough reputation. In some Republican circles, the phrase “climate change” has become so politicized that communication experts recommend avoiding it in favor of more GOP-friendly terms like “resilience,” “future-proofing,” and “extreme weather.”




[ad_2]

Original Post

24 thoughts on “Natural gas company goes to great lengths to avoid saying the word ‘pipeline’

  • 5 December 2022 at 6:24 pm
    Permalink

    I used to be recommended this website through my cousin. I am no longer positive whether or not this submit is written by way of him as nobody else understand such specific approximately my trouble. You’re amazing! Thank you!

    Reply
  • 18 December 2022 at 9:41 am
    Permalink

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

    Reply
  • 24 December 2022 at 5:59 am
    Permalink

    What i don’t realize is if truth be told how you are now not really a lot more well-liked than you may be now. You are so intelligent. You know thus significantly when it comes to this matter, made me individually imagine it from so many varied angles. Its like women and men aren’t fascinated until it is something to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs excellent. All the time maintain it up!

    Reply
  • 27 December 2022 at 5:37 pm
    Permalink

    Good blog! I truly love how it is easy on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I’ve subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a nice day!

    Reply
  • 11 April 2023 at 8:36 am
    Permalink

    The root of your writing while sounding agreeable initially, did not sit very well with me after some time. Somewhere throughout the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer but only for a short while. I still have a problem with your jumps in logic and one might do well to fill in all those breaks. In the event you actually can accomplish that, I would definitely be impressed.

    Reply
  • 1 May 2023 at 3:25 pm
    Permalink

    It¦s really a great and helpful piece of information. I am satisfied that you shared this useful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply
  • 3 May 2023 at 8:37 am
    Permalink

    Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find so many useful info here in the post, we need develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

    Reply
  • 17 June 2023 at 7:30 pm
    Permalink

    I have not checked in here for a while since I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are good quality so I guess I will add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

    Reply
  • 24 August 2023 at 11:04 am
    Permalink

    Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

    Reply
  • 20 December 2023 at 2:29 pm
    Permalink

    I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my site 🙂

    Reply
  • 24 April 2024 at 11:33 am
    Permalink

    I?¦ve been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or weblog posts in this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this web site. Reading this information So i?¦m glad to convey that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what I needed. I most definitely will make certain to do not fail to remember this website and give it a glance on a continuing basis.

    Reply
  • 26 April 2024 at 8:07 pm
    Permalink

    What i don’t realize is if truth be told how you’re now not actually much more well-liked than you might be now. You are so intelligent. You understand thus significantly when it comes to this topic, produced me in my view believe it from so many various angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated except it is something to do with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs great. At all times care for it up!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *