Experts Bemoan Biden’s Mixed Messages On Old-Growth Forests

[ad_1]

A group of U.S. forest ecologists, climate scientists and conservationists are calling out what they view as a “huge disconnect” between President Joe Biden’s rhetoric about the urgent need to combat deforestation and the policies he’s advancing back home.

In remarks on his last day at COP26, the United Nations climate summit being held in Glasgow, Scotland, Biden touted the $550 billion in climate spending included in his Build Back Better plan making its way through Congress and applauded a new 100-country pledge to halt deforestation by the end of the decade.

“Preserving forests and other ecosystems can and should play an important role in meeting our ambitious climate goals as part of the net-zero emissions strategy we all have,” Biden said Tuesday. “The United States is going to lead by our example at home and support other forested nations and developing countries in setting and achieving ambitious action to conserve and restore these carbon sinks.”

His comments came a day after the White House released a 65-page long-term strategy for slashing greenhouse gas emissions that includes eyebrow-raising language about forest carbon removal: “Substantial forested lands, including large portions of our Western public lands, now have older forests which sequester less CO2 and are more vulnerable to natural disturbances.”

The line left “a lot of people going — pardon my French — ‘What the fuck!’” said Steve Pedery, conservation director at environmental organization Oregon Wild.

Pedery said the strategy document seems to float logging — specifically, cutting down mature stands of trees in order to plant younger ones — as a solution to climate change and climate-fueled wildfires.

“What’s next, resurrecting ‘clean coal’ and warning against the dangers of windmill cancer?” he said.

Old-growth forests sequester massive amounts of carbon in trees and soil, and scientists say protecting the few that remain intact will prove key to meeting climate and biodiversity targets.

Three forest scientists HuffPost interviewed — William Moomaw, professor emeritus of international environmental policy at Tufts University, Chad Hanson, forest ecologist at the John Muir Project’s Earth Island Institute, and Dominick DellaSala, chief scientist at forest advocacy group Wild Heritage — shared Pedery’s interpretation of the language.

The strategy document is “riddled with forestry science holes,” DellaSala said.

“We’ve got three ships passing in the night and we don’t have any skipper at the helm,” he added. “We’ve got a huge disconnect. … What the heck is going on? It’s an embarrassment on a global stage, if people are able to read between the lines.”

Moomaw is a five-time lead author of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports and considered the father of “proforestation,” which he defines as “growing forests to achieve their ecological potential for carbon accumulation and biodiversity.”

Moomaw said there’s a point at which growth and the rate of carbon storage peaks in a forest, usually in the midlife of the trees. This has led timber interests to argue ancient forests should be cut down and replaced with young trees. Moomaw called it “magical thinking.”

“Those younger trees, between now and 2050, will never have accumulated out of the atmosphere nearly as much carbon as the older trees would in that same growth time,” he said. “In other words, 30 years of growth of an older forest is going to remove more carbon out of the atmosphere by 2050 than planting new trees and letting them grow for 30 years.”

All three said Biden’s climate strategy document parrots that very industry talking point about replacing old trees with young ones. It’s a position that both ignores the initial carbon release from cutting down mature trees and operates on a timeline at odds with the emissions reductions scientists say are required to avoid catastrophic planetary warming.

“Any time you take trees out of the forests, you’re putting most of that carbon into the atmosphere,” DellaSala said.

“It’s all about the next few decades,” Hanson said. “The bottom line is we need to dramatically increase protection of existing forests — mature forests, old-growth forests, primary forests.”

As HuffPost previously reported, conservationists grew frustrated with the Biden administration early on over its lack of a strong commitment to halt logging of mature and old temperate forests in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. But in July, Biden moved to reverse the Trump administration’s dismantling of protections and end large-scale logging of old-growth trees in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, the world’s largest intact temperate rainforest.

After celebrating the Tongass decision as a sign that Biden is serious about using intact forests as a tool in the climate fight, many are once again feeling irked.

This week, Congress is expected to vote on the president’s bipartisan $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and accompanying $1.75 trillion spending package. The two pieces of legislation include several provisions that some experts and advocates argue will increase logging on federal and private lands, undermine the bills’ massive clean energy investments, and worsen planetary warming.

As of Thursday, more than 200 climate scientists and forest ecologists have signed a letter calling for Biden and Congress to remove the provisions, including $14 billion in Build Back Better for “hazardous fuels reduction projects” on national forest lands and mandates in the infrastructure bill to reduce wildfire risk across 30 million acres of federal lands.

In the letter, which Moomaw, Hanson, DellaSala and others spearheaded, the group argues that the two bills’ forests provisions “are promoted as wildfire management and climate solutions measures, but commercial logging conducted under the guise of ‘thinning’ and ‘fuel reduction’ typically removes mature, fire-resistant trees that are needed for forest resilience.”

“We need the Administration and Congress to enact policies that will substantially reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions from logging, and from fossil fuels, and increase accumulation of carbon in our forests,” the letter reads. Other lead signatories include Beverly Law, a professor emeritus at Oregon State University and an expert on the forest carbon cycle, and William Ripple, a climate scientist and professor of ecology at Oregon State.

The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

Hanson has plenty of critics. The Sacramento Bee reported last month about a series of scientific journal articles in which fire scientists criticized his opposition to thinning as a tool to reduce the risks of wildfires. One scientist, Susan Prichard, a fire ecologist at the University of Washington, went as far as to compare Hanson and his allies to climate change deniers.

Environmentalists are also not united on the idea that Biden’s Build Back Better plan would negatively impact America’s forests. In an interview with Vox, Collin O’Mara, CEO of the National Wildlife Federation, called the bill “the most significant investment ever in our national forests” and “an astonishingly big deal.”

As part of the new COP26 initiative, Biden said the U.S. would spend up to $9 billion toward the international effort to end deforestation and safeguard forest ecosystems. The funding would have to be approved by Congress, and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has already introduced legislation to establish a $9 billion trust fund.

More than 100 nations representing 85% of the world’s forests signed on to the pact. But there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about whether it will lead to real change. The New York Declaration on Forests, enacted at the U.N. climate conference in 2014, set a goal of cutting deforestation in half by 2020 and ending it altogether by 2030. Instead, deforestation has continued to soar.

The world loses an estimated 27 football fields of trees to deforestation every minute.

Back in April, dozens of environmental groups, including the National Resources Defense Council and Earthjustice, called on the Biden administration to impose a moratorium on all old-growth logging in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska and to make the protection of carbon-rich forests a central part of its push during COP26. More than 120 green groups renewed those calls in an Oct. 28 letter to the White House.

“It is not enough to simply pressure developing countries on older forest and rainforest protections — the U.S. must take meaningful action to conserve and restore carbon-rich forests and trees across all our forest types here at home,” the organizations wrote last week.



[ad_2]

Original Post

45 thoughts on “Experts Bemoan Biden’s Mixed Messages On Old-Growth Forests

  • 9 October 2022 at 6:13 pm
    Permalink

    Hi, just required you to know I he added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I believe your internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make reading your blog significantly easier.

    Reply
  • 22 November 2022 at 4:57 pm
    Permalink

    I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You have ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye

    Reply
  • 14 December 2022 at 9:58 am
    Permalink

    I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours these days, but I never discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It’s pretty price enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the web can be a lot more helpful than ever before.

    Reply
  • 16 December 2022 at 10:48 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such excellent information being shared freely out there.

    Reply
  • 17 December 2022 at 9:02 pm
    Permalink

    I was just looking for this info for a while. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your website. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Usually the top sites are full of garbage.

    Reply
  • 22 December 2022 at 6:03 am
    Permalink

    I do like the manner in which you have presented this particular situation and it does indeed supply me some fodder for consideration. However, coming from everything that I have experienced, I just simply hope as other feedback pile on that folks keep on point and in no way embark upon a tirade associated with the news of the day. Still, thank you for this exceptional piece and although I can not really concur with it in totality, I respect your point of view.

    Reply
  • 26 December 2022 at 4:53 am
    Permalink

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your site. You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Regards!

    Reply
  • 28 December 2022 at 12:01 pm
    Permalink

    Howdy would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with? I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique. P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

    Reply
  • 2 January 2023 at 1:53 am
    Permalink

    Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

    Reply
  • 2 March 2023 at 11:14 am
    Permalink

    I have been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or blog posts on this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i’m happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most certainly will make certain to don’t forget this web site and give it a look on a constant basis.

    Reply
  • 12 April 2023 at 8:00 am
    Permalink

    I like reading through and I conceive this website got some genuinely useful stuff on it! .

    Reply
  • 12 April 2023 at 7:19 pm
    Permalink

    Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Thank you

    Reply
  • 15 April 2023 at 3:25 pm
    Permalink

    Hey, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Opera, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!

    Reply
  • 2 May 2023 at 2:50 pm
    Permalink

    My wife and i ended up being now fulfilled Louis managed to round up his survey from the precious recommendations he made out of the weblog. It’s not at all simplistic to simply continually be giving for free thoughts which a number of people could have been making money from. Therefore we know we now have you to thank for this. The most important explanations you made, the straightforward web site navigation, the relationships you can help to promote – it is all overwhelming, and it is aiding our son and the family consider that that issue is thrilling, and that’s highly vital. Thanks for the whole lot!

    Reply
  • 24 August 2023 at 11:45 pm
    Permalink

    I am not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for great info I was looking for this information for my mission.

    Reply
  • 2 November 2023 at 11:44 pm
    Permalink

    You made some decent points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will go along with with your website.

    Reply
  • 19 March 2024 at 5:51 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for any other informative web site. The place else may I am getting that kind of information written in such an ideal manner? I’ve a project that I am just now running on, and I have been at the look out for such info.

    Reply
  • 30 March 2024 at 4:48 am
    Permalink

    Hello my loved one! I wish to say that this article is amazing, nice written and include approximately all vital infos. I?¦d like to peer extra posts like this .

    Reply
  • 31 March 2024 at 7:55 pm
    Permalink

    I just couldn’t depart your website before suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard info a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to check up on new posts

    Reply
  • 2 April 2024 at 5:47 am
    Permalink

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

    Reply
  • 10 April 2024 at 7:15 am
    Permalink

    What is FlowForce Max? FlowForce Max Advanced Formula is a holistic blend designed to promote optimal prostate health

    Reply
  • 15 April 2024 at 11:40 am
    Permalink

    I have recently started a web site, the information you offer on this site has helped me greatly. Thank you for all of your time & work.

    Reply
  • 15 April 2024 at 11:12 pm
    Permalink

    I just could not depart your web site prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard info a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to check up on new posts

    Reply
  • 16 April 2024 at 5:49 pm
    Permalink

    My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on several websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    Reply
  • 19 April 2024 at 12:29 pm
    Permalink

    Lottery Defeater Software? Lottery Defeater is a software application created to help people win lotteries

    Reply
  • 25 April 2024 at 6:47 am
    Permalink

    whoah this weblog is great i love reading your articles. Stay up the great paintings! You recognize, a lot of people are hunting around for this info, you can help them greatly.

    Reply
  • 25 April 2024 at 8:58 am
    Permalink

    hello there and thank you to your info – I have definitely picked up anything new from proper here. I did however experience a few technical points the usage of this website, since I experienced to reload the web site many instances previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Now not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading cases occasions will often have an effect on your placement in google and can harm your high quality score if advertising and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS to my email and could glance out for much extra of your respective exciting content. Make sure you replace this once more soon..

    Reply
  • 27 April 2024 at 6:14 am
    Permalink

    Awsome post and straight to the point. I don’t know if this is really the best place to ask but do you guys have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thx 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *