New York rejects gas power plants as ‘inconsistent’ with climate law

[ad_1]

In the lead-up to the United Nations climate summit known as COP26, New York state officials made a landmark decision to deny permits for two proposed natural gas power plants after determining they would be inconsistent with the state’s greenhouse gas emissions targets and were not needed for grid reliability. The decisions, announced by the Department of Environmental Conservation, or DEC, last week, mark the first time the state has wielded its 2019 climate law to reject proposals for new electricity generation. 

“We must shift to a renewable future,” DEC commissioner Basil Seggos wrote in a tweet announcing the decisions, tagging #COP26.

After the Biden administration’s recent failure to pass a law designed to move the power sector toward the goal of 100 percent clean electricity by 2035, the decisions in New York signal that state-level climate laws could prove to be a key alternative tool to get there.

New York climate advocates cheered the announcement. “This is a big deal. It’s a real turning point,” said Raya Salter, a senior advisor for the nonprofit WE ACT for Environmental Justice. “It really shows the power of the CLCPA,” she said, referring to the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. The law requires New York to have 100 percent emissions-free electricity by 2040, and to cut emissions across the economy 85 percent by 2050.

Both power plants would have replaced decades-old, heavily polluting facilities with new, more efficient gas-burning technology. One, proposed by Danskammer Energy, would have replaced a 1950s-era oil- and gas-burning plant in Newburgh, New York, which currently operates as a “peaker plant,” running only a handful of days each year during periods of high demand. The other, proposed by NRG Energy, would have replaced another peaker plant in Astoria, Queens, in New York City. The existing oil- and gas-burning plant, which began running in 1970, will be forced to shut down in 2023 due to new state regulations that limit the release of nitrogen oxides, pollutants that aggravate respiratory issues. 

The news follows a similar decision by the DEC last year to reject a key water permit for the Williams Pipeline, a proposed natural gas pipeline, which the agency also found was inconsistent with the state’s climate law. In notices to NRG and Danskammer, Daniel Whitehead, the director of environmental permits at DEC, wrote that the state needed to accelerate its transition from all fossil fuels. “Constructing and operating a new fossil fuel-fired power plant accomplishes the exact opposite and perpetuates a reliance on fossil fuels,” the letters said.

In addition to citing emissions limits, the letters also noted that the Astoria plant would likely have a disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities in the area — which the CLCPA also prohibits. Whitehead wrote that even if the facility satisfied the emissions requirements of the law, the agency could not approve the plant unless it “also satisfied this separate requirement” — sending a strong message about how the DEC will weigh environmental justice in future decision making. (The state is still in the process of defining “disadvantaged community”; the notice cited its interim definition.)

Stylianos Karolidis, a native of Astoria and an activist with the Democratic Socialists of America, was thrilled but not surprised by the DEC’s decision. He said there was overwhelming public opposition to the project. Karolidis helped run a campaign against the plant that resulted in more than 6,500 public comments and garnered support at every level of government, from district leaders all the way to U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer. “They did it because thousands of people were pressuring them to do it,” he said. “And they were making a huge, loud, impactful, publicly visible fight.”

Still, the result was not guaranteed. While the CLCPA put a goal of zero-emissions electricity into law, it did not say how the state should achieve it. New York is currently developing a “scoping plan” that will likely lay out whether solutions like natural gas power plants with carbon capture could be part of the mix, or plants that run on biogas or clean hydrogen. Some studies have found that these types of plants may be needed to complement wind, solar, and hydropower because they supply reliable, “always-on” power. But many environmental advocates deem them false solutions because they have not been proven economical yet and can perpetuate fossil fuel use and harmful pollution. 

Both NRG and Danskammer argued that their proposals were in line with the state’s goals because they would be able to run the plants on hydrogen or biogas in the future. But DEC determined that those plans were “uncertain and speculative in nature.”

Justin Gundlach, a senior attorney at the Institute for Policy Integrity, a New York University think tank, said the decisions are likely to set a precedent and steer planning in New York’s power sector by “tamping down expectations” about whether the future promise of clean hydrogen can justify the development of natural gas plants today.

Danskammer did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement, NRG Energy vice president of development Tom Atkins said in a statement that the company was reviewing the decision. “It’s unfortunate that New York is turning down an opportunity to dramatically reduce emissions and strengthen reliable power for millions of New Yorkers at such a critical time,” he said.

The DEC’s decision might also have influence outside of New York state, as the natural gas industry is fighting to convince policymakers and regulators everywhere that natural gas can be part of a “lower carbon” future. According to a Sierra Club study from earlier this year, at least 32 electric utilities around the country are planning to build new natural gas plants this decade. That’s despite the fact that several of those companies, such as Dominion Energy, have announced goals to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. 

While many states have passed laws limiting greenhouse gas emissions, that has not yet stopped them from approving new natural gas plants. The only other example Grist could find of a state agency rejecting a proposal for a new natural gas plant due to climate goals did not actually stop construction of the plant. Last year, the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission rejected a plan by El Paso Electric Company to charge consumers $168 million to build a new natural gas plant, citing the state’s legally mandated goal of 100 percent clean electricity by 2045. But the plant was going to be constructed in Texas, so the company is moving ahead and is instead planning to sell the electricity solely to its Texas customers

In California, the law requires the state get 60 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2030. As of 2020, the state was only about halfway there. The California utility commission in charge of approving power plants has sent mixed signals on whether it will accept proposals for new gas plants

Activists in New York are hoping that the DEC’s permit denials mean that it will also deny permits to two other highly controversial fossil fuel projects. A natural gas plant that runs solely to power Bitcoin mining is seeking renewal of its air permit in Niagara County. An expansion of a liquefied natural gas facility in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, also has air permits pending.

Shay O’Reilly, a New York City organizer for the Sierra Club, said the decisions also felt like a marked change from when Governor Andrew Cuomo was in office. Cuomo resigned in August after being accused by multiple women of sexual harassment, and then-Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul succeeded him. “My hope is that this is a sign that our amazing officials at the State Department of Environmental Conservation are being given the reins to use their expertise in pursuit of the common good in our state,” O’Reilly said.




[ad_2]

Original Post

30 thoughts on “New York rejects gas power plants as ‘inconsistent’ with climate law

  • 6 December 2022 at 12:21 am
    Permalink

    Thanks for any other great article. Where else may anyone get that kind of info in such a perfect approach of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such information.

    Reply
  • 27 December 2022 at 2:37 pm
    Permalink

    I am extremely impressed together with your writing skills as neatly as with the layout to your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great weblog like this one nowadays..

    Reply
  • 27 December 2022 at 6:20 pm
    Permalink

    Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to get that “perfect balance” between usability and appearance. I must say you have done a very good job with this. Also, the blog loads super quick for me on Safari. Outstanding Blog!

    Reply
  • 16 January 2023 at 12:20 am
    Permalink

    Enjoyed looking at this, very good stuff, appreciate it. “Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.” by Euripides.

    Reply
  • 17 February 2023 at 4:14 pm
    Permalink

    I like what you guys are up too. Such intelligent work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my web site 🙂

    Reply
  • 1 March 2023 at 5:49 pm
    Permalink

    I like what you guys are up too. Such intelligent work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website 🙂

    Reply
  • 17 March 2023 at 3:26 am
    Permalink

    You actually make it appear really easy together with your presentation however I to find this matter to be actually something which I believe I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m taking a look ahead in your next publish, I?¦ll attempt to get the hold of it!

    Reply
  • 15 April 2023 at 8:30 pm
    Permalink

    Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch! “To be 70 years young is sometimes far more cheerful and hopeful than to be 40 years old.” by Oliver Wendell Holmes.

    Reply
  • 30 April 2023 at 10:42 pm
    Permalink

    You got a very great website, Sword lily I detected it through yahoo.

    Reply
  • 4 May 2023 at 9:44 pm
    Permalink

    I saw a lot of website but I conceive this one has something extra in it in it

    Reply
  • 19 January 2024 at 6:40 pm
    Permalink

    Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to exchange strategies with others, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.

    Reply
  • 28 February 2024 at 7:49 pm
    Permalink

    I liked up to you will obtain carried out right here. The comic strip is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. however, you command get got an edginess over that you want be delivering the following. unwell without a doubt come more beforehand again as precisely the same nearly very ceaselessly inside case you defend this increase.

    Reply
  • 28 March 2024 at 1:36 pm
    Permalink

    I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you put to create this kind of great informative website.

    Reply
  • 10 April 2024 at 12:30 am
    Permalink

    What is Alpha Tonic? Alpha Tonic stands as a natural health supplement designed to comprehensively address men’s overall well-being.

    Reply
  • 10 April 2024 at 5:27 am
    Permalink

    What is FlowForce Max? FlowForce Max Advanced Formula is a holistic blend designed to promote optimal prostate health

    Reply
  • 19 April 2024 at 6:58 am
    Permalink

    I simply desired to appreciate you again. I do not know the things that I might have undertaken without the actual ways shown by you relating to my field. It was actually a frustrating dilemma in my circumstances, but finding out your specialised style you solved it made me to cry with joy. I’m just happier for this information and then trust you find out what a great job you have been accomplishing educating the others via your websites. More than likely you have never encountered any of us.

    Reply
  • 22 April 2024 at 8:43 am
    Permalink

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

    Reply
  • 25 April 2024 at 6:05 pm
    Permalink

    With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any solutions to help stop content from being ripped off? I’d definitely appreciate it.

    Reply
  • 27 April 2024 at 3:48 pm
    Permalink

    Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself spending way to much time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *