Is the Universe Fine-Tuned for Life? – Universe Today
[ad_1]
For decades, various physicists have theorized that even the slightest changes in the fundamental laws of nature would make it impossible for life to exist. This idea, also known as the “Fine-Tuned Universe” argument, suggests that the occurrence of life in the Universe is very sensitive to the values of certain fundamental physics. Alter any of these values (as the logic goes), and life would not exist, meaning we must be very fortunate to be here!
But can this really be the case, or is it possible that life can emerge under different physical constants, and we just don’t know it? This question was recently tackled by Luke A. Barnes, a postdoctoral researcher at the Sidney Institute for Astronomy (SIA) in Australia. In his recent book, A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos, he and Sydney astrophysics professor Geraint F. Lewis argued that a fine-tuned Universe makes sense from a physics standpoint.
The authors also summarized these arguments in an invited contribution paper, which appeared in the Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics (1st ed.) In this paper, titled “The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Life,” Barnes explains how “fine-tuning” consists of explaining observations by employing a “suspiciously precise assumption.” This, he argues, has been symptomatic of incomplete theories throughout history and is a common feature of modern cosmology and particle physics.
In some respects, this idea is similar to the Anthropic Principle, which states that any attempt to explain the properties of the Universe cannot ignore our existence as lifeforms. This stands in stark contrast to the Cosmological Principle – aka. Copernican Principle, named after Nicolaus Copernicus, who formulated the heliocentric model of the Universe – which states that there is nothing unique or special about humans or our place in the Universe.
In a previous paper, Barnes and Lewis argued that far from being a case of arrogance or “religion in disguise,” the Anthropic Principle is a necessary part of science. When addressing the coincidence between humanity’s existence and a Universe that is old enough and governed by physics that favor the emergence of intelligent life (i.e., us), they derived a simple maxim: “Any account of the coincidence must consider how the Universe makes beings that are capable of measuring [it].”
But as Barnes explained to Universe Today via email, there are some significant differences between the Anthropic Principle and the Fine-Tuned Universe:
“I understand the relationship between fine-tuning and the anthropic principle as follows. Fine-tuning refers to the fact that small changes to the constants of nature would have resulted in a universe incapable of supporting life. The Anthropic Principle says that if physical life-forms exist, they must observe that they are in a universe that is capable of sustaining their existence.”
Put another way, Barnes states that the Anthropic Principle is an unfalsifiable statement (aka. a tautology) that results from the “selection effect” of our own existence. Since we do not have a population of intelligent life and civilizations to select from, the principle itself cannot be falsified. Meanwhile, says Barnes, the fine-tuning argument is a “surprising fact about the laws of nature as we know them.”
The Fine-Tuned Universe argument dates back to the 1970s when physics began to note that small changes to the fundamental constants of nature, or in the Universe’s initial conditions, would rule out life as we know it. Had the cosmos and the laws of physics themselves evolved differently, the stability required for living creatures to exist (in all their complexity) would not be possible.
But as Barnes notes in his summary paper, this logic runs afoul of the same old problem. Like the geocentric model of antiquity, it contains suspiciously precise assumptions, which he proceeds to address one by one. The first has to do with the Cosmological Constant (CC), an idea Einstein proposed in 1917 as a temporary addition to his field equations for General Relativity. Denoted by the character Lambda, the CC was a force that would “counterbalance gravity” and thus ensure the Universe remained static (a popular view at the time).
While Einstein ditched the CC a few years later when he learned that astronomers had proven that the Universe is expanding, the idea has been reinterpreted since the 1990s. With the realization that cosmic expansion is accelerating, physicists began postulating that Einstein’s CC could be the mysterious force known as “Dark Energy” (DE). This led to the widely accepted cosmological theory known as the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) model.
However, the CC also represents one of the most significant theoretical problems in modern physics. Like Dark Matter, the existence of DE or a reinvented CC was proposed to explain the difference between observations and theoretical predictions. Like Ptolemy’s “epicycles” that were used to rationalize observations that didn’t conform with the geocentric model, the CC is an assumption that is “suspiciously precise.”
In addition, there are the inconsistencies CC has with quantum field theory (QFT), which describes particles as configurations of a field. According to QFT, a particular configuration known as a “vacuum state” will still exist in the absence of particles. But if theories regarding CC and DE are to be believed, this would mean that there is a considerable amount of energy in the vacuum state.
The only way to explain this in terms acceptable to QFT and General Relativity is by assuming that the contributions of vacuum energy and quantum fields cancel each out. Once again, this requires a “suspiciously precise” coincidence between several independent factors. In another vein, the Standard Model of Particle Physics tells us that matter consists of 25 different types of subatomic particles divided into four groups (Quarks, Leptons, Guage Bosons, and Scalar Bosons).
The existence of these particles and their respective properties (mass, charge, and spin) have all been verified through rigorous experimentation. The slightest deviation to any of these properties would significantly affect how they interact and behave, leading to the complete instability of matter. Much the same is true of the dimensionality of spacetime, where three dimensions of space (as postulated by Newton) are needed for stable atoms and stable planetary orbits.
A Universe with three spatial dimensions and one dimension of time (as described by General Relativity) is also essential. Any more, says Barnes, and atomic systems could not remain stable. In other words, while the CC may raise theoretical problems, the Standard Model and the dimensionality of space-time are consistent with the fine-tuned model. As Barnes put it:
“The cosmological constant is unexplained in our equations and is consistent with a life-permitting universe only in a very small range. Its value is an unmotivated and precise assumption, in the constant of the standard models of particle physics and cosmology. Many of the other constants of the standard model are the same.”
The question, then, is how does one resolve these issues in our conventional models? What else could explain the fact that our Universe is life-permitting while variations of the smallest kind would make that impossible? To this, Barnes and Lewis suggest that the Multiverse could come to the rescue. “Perhaps the multiverse – our universe is life-permitting by chance, and there are lots of other variegated universes out there,” he said.
But in the meantime, there is still the possibility that any inconsistencies or incongruities indicate what the truth is. Like Copernicus, who realized that the motions of the planets (which required epicycles and equants to make sense) were actually an indication that the model was wrong, fine-tuning may be an indication of physics beyond the standard model or that the model itself needs revision.
“I think fine-tuning in general is a clue to a deeper explanation. Small probabilities might just be small probabilities, or they might be generated by some incorrect assumptions,” Barnes added. “The interesting thing about the fine-tuning of the fundamental constants is that they’re at the bottom floor of scientific explanations at the moment. They’re as deep as physics goes (at least, while it’s supported by evidence.)”
Barnes and Lewis are also responsible for The Cosmic Revolutionary’s Handbook: (Or: How to Beat the Big Bang), which further details their theories on cosmology and the fine-tuned model (published in 2019).
Further Reading: arXiv
[ad_2]
Original Post
This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!
Wow! Thank you! I constantly wanted to write on my blog something like that. Can I implement a portion of your post to my blog?
I conceive this site has got very good written subject material blog posts.
great post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector don’t notice this. You should proceed your writing. I am confident, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!
I like this post, enjoyed this one appreciate it for putting up.
There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.
It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.
After study a few of the blog posts on your website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Pls check out my web site as well and let me know what you think.
Hi my friend! I wish to say that this article is awesome, nice written and come with almost all significant infos. I would like to see more posts like this.
Great blog! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am bookmarking your feeds also
Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. was truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing.
Hello there, I found your blog by the use of Google while searching for a related topic, your site got here up, it seems great. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
Some really fantastic work on behalf of the owner of this web site, dead outstanding subject material.
Aw, this was a really nice post. In thought I want to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and precise effort to make a very good article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and on no account appear to get something done.
Simply desire to say your article is as amazing. The clearness to your put up is simply cool and that i can suppose you are an expert on this subject. Fine along with your permission let me to snatch your RSS feed to keep up to date with coming near near post. Thank you a million and please carry on the enjoyable work.
Thank you so much for giving everyone such a special opportunity to read critical reviews from here. It is usually very useful and full of amusement for me personally and my office peers to search your site really three times a week to find out the fresh tips you will have. Not to mention, I am just at all times satisfied for the incredible methods you give. Selected 4 facts in this posting are unquestionably the most effective I’ve had.
I am continuously searching online for tips that can benefit me. Thanks!
What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & aid other users like its aided me. Great job.
Great post. I am facing a couple of these problems.
I believe this internet site has got some really superb info for everyone :D. “As ill-luck would have it.” by Miguel de Cervantes.
Hello my friend! I want to say that this post is amazing, nice written and include almost all important infos. I?¦d like to peer more posts like this .
I would like to thnkx for the efforts you have put in writing this site. I am hoping the same high-grade website post from you in the upcoming also. In fact your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own web site now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a great example of it.
Hey I am so grateful I found your blog page, I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Askjeeve for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for a tremendous post and a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all at the moment but I have saved it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the awesome job.
naturally like your web site but you have to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I in finding it very troublesome to tell the reality on the other hand I will definitely come back again.
Hello there, just become alert to your weblog via Google, and located that it’s really informative. I’m gonna be careful for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you happen to continue this in future. A lot of folks will probably be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
Enjoyed reading this, very good stuff, appreciate it. “Hereafter, in a better world than this, I shall desire more love and knowledge of you.” by William Shakespeare.
Some genuinely nice and useful info on this site, as well I conceive the style contains fantastic features.
Hello. remarkable job. I did not expect this. This is a splendid story. Thanks!
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your blog. You have some really great articles and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an e-mail if interested. Thank you!
Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the pictures on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.