European activists want to ban fossil fuel ads. Why can’t we do that here?
[ad_1]
Greenpeace E.U. and 20 other environmental organizations launched a new campaign this month demanding a European Union–wide ban on fossil fuel advertisements. The groups’ proposal would not only prohibit the promotion of coal, oil, gas, gasoline-powered vehicles, airplanes, and so-called “false solutions” — like unrealistic paths to decarbonization — but it would also stop oil companies from advertising altogether. To kick off the effort, dozens of Greenpeace activists descended on Rotterdam to block traffic around Europe’s largest oil refinery.
“Coal and gas = climate chaos,” their signs read.
Across the Atlantic, U.S.-based climate activists applauded the campaign, which they say could help delegitimize fossil fuel companies in the public eye. But differences between American and European law mean that American climate groups would face greater difficulty if they called for an outright ban on fossil fuel advertising. Instead, American advocacy groups have been challenging the content of fossil fuel companies’ advertisements, rather than their very existence.
In any jurisdiction, there’s much to complain about; fossil fuel ads tend to paint an exaggeratedly rosy picture of the industry. According to TV and social media promotions, Exxon is hard at work capturing “the most CO2 of any company.” Shell is “giving back to kids” in its community. And Chevron is “focusing on environmental issues that matter” by monitoring Australian sea turtle hatchlings and “assisting their journey from nest to ocean.”
“These ads are harmful and misleading to consumers,” said Anusha Narayanan, climate campaign manager for Greenpeace USA. While ads make it seem like the companies are working in good faith to address the climate crisis, she explained, the industry reality is actually quite different. Chevron, for example, put just 0.2 percent of its capital expenditures toward developing low-carbon sources of energy between 2010 and 2018. And it’s a similar story for Shell and ExxonMobil, neither of which has heavily invested in renewable energy. As of 2020, none of the 59 major fossil fuel companies had announced climate plans that were in line with the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit).
Kenzo Tribouillard / AFP via Getty Images
According to Narayanan and others, climate-focused advertisements help bolster oil and gas companies’ “social license” to operate — basically, their legitimacy in the eyes of consumers and other stakeholders. By exaggerating their commitment to decarbonization, she said, they can paint themselves green while continuing to sell the very products that cause climate change.
But the U.S.’s protective stance toward freedom of expression means that banning fossil fuel ads outright, as Greenpeace E.U. aims to do, is a nonstarter for American government officials. According to Douglas Kysar, an environmental law professor at Yale, it’s easier for American state and federal authorities to regulate speech by placing stipulations on when, where, or how it can occur than by prohibiting it altogether.
“To ban all speech by a particular actor?” he said. “That’s a very difficult thing to achieve without running afoul of the Constitution.”
When it came to restricting cigarette advertisements, for example, it tooks years of actions from lawmakers and multiple regulatory bodies to achieve today’s sweeping bans. There was the 1964 warning from the U.S. attorney general that smoking causes cancer, and the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act that was enacted two years later, requiring tobacco companies to place warning labels on their cigarette packages. There was the 1970 ban on TV and radio ads for cigarettes enacted by Congress. And there was the major 1998 settlement between cigarette manufacturers and dozens of state attorneys general barring cigarettes from being advertised on outdoor billboards or in public transportation in 46 states. More recently, the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act banned tobacco companies from sponsoring sports and music events, and placed new restrictions on advertising near public schools.
“The more scientific evidence and bipartisan, multi-branch, multi-level government expressions of concern there are about a particular thing,” said Sarah Ludington, director of Duke Law’s First Amendment Clinic, the likelier it is that lawmakers and regulators will be able to overcome First Amendment protections for freedom of expression.
Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images
The political consensus that enabled cigarette advertising restrictions is absent when it comes to fossil fuels — and without it, there’s not much that regulatory agencies can do. Since 1980, government bodies have had to meet four criteria in order to regulate what is known as “commercial speech” — which is not fully protected by the First Amendment. First, they must show that advertisements’ messaging is misleading. Then they must prove that the government has what Kysar called a “legitimate state interest” in curtailing the messaging. They must then show that their proposed regulation materially advances that interest, and they must pass a “least restrictive means” test, demonstrating that they are only suppressing as much speech as is necessary to meet the state interest.
Although fossil fuels pose an even greater threat to public health than smoking, Kysar said it would be hard to justify sweeping restrictions on fossil fuel advertisements without a clearer signal that the federal government is committed to rapidly decarbonizing the economy. “We’re still subsidizing fossil fuel production to the tune of tens of billions of dollars per year,” Kysar said. “If they tried to simultaneously ban the advertisement of fossil fuels while they are still perfectly lawful and heavily subsidized, that’s not gonna look like a legitimate state interest.”
According to Ludington, it’s not even clear which U.S. agency would be able to impose a fossil fuel ad ban — even if the political stars were to align. Whether it’s the Environmental Protection Agency, or the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, the U.S.’s consumer protection agency, she said, they’d likely have to get specific authorization — from an act of Congress, for example, or from a presidential executive order.
Given these constraints, American climate advocacy groups concerned about misleading fossil fuel advertising have tried two main tactics so far. The first is to bring tort and consumer protection lawsuits against fossil fuel companies for greenwashing. These lawsuits only tangentially demand changes to companies’ advertising practices; they mostly seek compensation for financial, physical, or emotional damages caused by fossil fuel companies’ misleading or fraudulent claims.
The second tactic is to ask the FTC to enforce its “Green Guides” — a set of truth-in-advertising guidelines related to environmental claims — against specific companies. Perhaps the most prominent U.S. effort to target fossil fuel advertisers is a complaint filed by Greenpeace USA, Earthworks, and Global Witness, which asked the FTC to bar Chevron from overplaying its renewable energy investmentsIf successful, the FTC case could compel Chevron to change the content of its advertisements.
Back in Europe, Greenpeace E.U.’s proposal to ban fossil fuel advertisements hinges on a tool called the European Citizens’ Initiative, which allows any group of citizens to launch a petition to be considered by the European Commission. If a petition gets 1 million signatures across seven E.U. countries in a one-year period, the commission is forced to evaluate it and prepare a proposal for lawmakers. The strategy has already shown promise in one Greenpeace-backed campaign calling for a pesticide ban, and another demanding an end to the use of cages for farm animals.
Stefano Montesi – Corbis / Getty Images
“The European Citizens’ Initiative allows people to mobilize, grab the mic, and insist on change happening,” said Paul Musiol, a communications officer for Greenpeace E.U. The closest thing the U.S. has to that is state ballot initiatives or referendums, which are by definition incapable of proposing federal legislation, although they have helped push forward many significant environmental policies.
Silvia Pastorelli, a climate and energy campaigner for Greenpeace E.U., emphasized that activists, policymakers, and regulators across jurisdictions should make use of all available strategies to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for its deceptive advertising practices. Amsterdam, for instance, outlawed fossil fuel advertising in its metro system in May, and France passed a climate bill that will prohibit advertisements for coal, oil, gas, and gasoline-powered cars starting in 2022. She also mentioned the international Clean Creatives campaign, which pressures advertising agencies to drop their fossil fuel clients.
“There are a lot of different ways in which people are challenging the fossil fuel industry’s dominance,” she said.
Kysar agreed, adding that many of these approaches’ value lay in their symbolic nature. Even if the E.U. campaign might be unsuccessful in the U.S. legal context, he said, it could still help erode the fossil fuel industry’s social license to operate, turning oil and gas “from a lawful energy product to something illicit, taboo, the kind of goods that need to be suppressed and banned.”
“Whether or not the strategy succeeds in a formal, legal matter,” he said, “as an advocacy matter, that’s powerful.”
Editor’s note: Greenpeace is an advertiser with Grist. Advertisers have no role in Grist’s editorial decisions.
[ad_2]
Original Post
Excellent blog here! Additionally your website lots up very fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I get your associate link for your host? I desire my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol
Some truly superb information, Gladiolus I found this. “What we say is important for in most cases the mouth speaks what the heart is full of.” by Jim Beggs.
hi!,I like your writing very much! share we communicate more about your article on AOL? I require an expert on this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to see you.
I just could not depart your site before suggesting that I actually enjoyed the standard info a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often to check up on new posts
Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is magnificent, let alone the content!
I like this blog very much so much good information.
Hey! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My site goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to send me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the way!
It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I desire to read even more things about it!
Hello! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Thanks
This really answered my problem, thank you!
This really answered my problem, thank you!
I am impressed with this internet site, real I am a fan.
I simply couldn’t leave your site prior to suggesting that I extremely loved the usual information a person supply on your visitors? Is going to be again ceaselessly to inspect new posts.
Rattling fantastic information can be found on weblog.
I like this post, enjoyed this one thank you for posting. “I never let schooling interfere with my education.” by Mark Twain.
It is actually a great and useful piece of info. I am glad that you shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
An fascinating discussion is price comment. I believe that you need to write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo topic but generally persons are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers
I’m not sure exactly why but this site is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.
Greetings I am so grateful I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was researching on Aol for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the fantastic work.
Great beat ! I wish to apprentice at the same time as you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I were tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided shiny clear concept
Howdy! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.
I discovered your blog website on google and test a number of of your early posts. Continue to keep up the very good operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Seeking forward to studying extra from you in a while!…
But wanna comment on few general things, The website design and style is perfect, the content is real wonderful : D.
Those are yours alright! . We at least need to get these people stealing images to start blogging! They probably just did a image search and grabbed them. They look good though!
I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this information for my mission.
Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!
It¦s really a cool and helpful piece of information. I¦m satisfied that you just shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
I’d incessantly want to be update on new posts on this website , saved to bookmarks! .
I truly enjoy reading on this site, it has good posts. “Beauty in things exist in the mind which contemplates them.” by David Hume.
Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and net and this is actually annoying. A good site with interesting content, that is what I need. Thanks for keeping this site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can’t find it.
I believe this website has some rattling superb info for everyone : D.
You are a very smart individual!