How economists helped Big Oil obstruct climate action for decades

[ad_1]

For more than a decade, researchers and journalists have tried to lay bare the PR machine employed by fossil fuel companies to delay climate action. Science historian Naomi Oreskes’ Merchants of Doubt detailed the critical role some scientists played in denying the soundness of climate science. Later, an investigation by InsideClimate News revealed that while Exxon denied climate change publicly, its own scientists were aware for decades of how fossil fuels warm the planet. 

Political leaders have long cited economic research on how taking action on climate change would be prohibitively expensive. President Donald Trump even used the findings as part of his reasoning to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.

But who exactly is behind that economic research? Legal expert, physicist, and now science historian Benjamin Franta, of Stanford University, decided to take a deeper look. He recently published his findings in the journal Environmental Politics: Since the late 1980s, economists at private consulting firms, funded by the fossil fuel industry, have played a key role in shaping public discourse about climate policy in the U.S., hawking flawed research and spreading disinformation everywhere from newspapers to congressional testimonies. In an interview with Grist, Franta discusses economists’ role in the fossil fuel industry’s PR campaign, and why these relationships flew under the radar for such a long time. 

“For decades, [these] economists have been inflating the cost of action,” Franta said, “and downplaying the cost of inaction.” 

 This interview has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity

Q. What inspired you to do this particular research on the economic think tanks that have influenced climate policy? 

A. It happened by accident. About four years ago, in 2017, I was doing research for one of my graduate history classes at Stanford about the American Petroleum Institute and its history with regard to climate change. I was downloading large collections of newspaper articles and I noticed that it wasn’t just the denial of climate science that the industry was promoting, it was these economic talking points as well. I also noticed that the economic experts or sources that the industry cited tended to be the same few people over many years, often Charles River Associates, an economic consulting firm. As I was doing all this research, then-President Trump announced that the U.S. was going to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. He cited economic statistics that sounded a lot like what I’d been reading from newspaper articles in the 1990s. The study was written by some of the exact same people I had been reading about.

Q. Who were these people, and what were their strategies?

A. I tried to track all the activities that I could from the economic consulting firm Charles Rivers Associates. Every time a major climate policy was proposed, these economists would be there, writing newspaper articles and giving testimony in front of Congress. From carbon tax conversations in the Clinton administration to [opposing] international treaties, like the Kyoto Protocol and the COP meetings. They also worked to defeat the cap and trade bills that were proposed throughout the 2000s in the U.S. When that was basically defeated, and climate policy became an issue for the states, like in California, they would go to address the California climate policies too.

There is one advertorial in the New York Times, an advertisement presented as a news article, from March 6, 1997. This was around when the Kyoto Protocol was being negotiated. The piece iss called “Stop, Look and Listen before we leap,” and it starts off: “International efforts to deal with climate change are lurching from speculation towards actions that could wreak havoc on nations, even as the underlying science and economics continue to signal caution.” It represents this two-prong strategy that the industry used again and again, where it would cast doubt on the science and say, “Well, actually, we don’t know if climate change is happening, or if it’s from fossil fuels.” And then they would go, “And even if it does, it’s too expensive to act.” 

Q. Were these statistics peer-reviewed? How credible were they? 

A. It’s a very corrupt process where the industry pays the consultants to come up with the result that the industry wants. And they can’t give anything else because their model can only produce this outcome. It’s not a peer-reviewed publication, the details are not even available to other economists to scrutinize because their models are proprietary. And then it’s printed in newspapers, like the New York Times, and it’s given in congressional testimony to senators and representatives, where it’s passed off — often by the oil companies that paid for it — as  independent, rigorous research when it was neither one of those things.

Q. You mentioned that the models are designed in a way that rigs the game from the start. Can you explain that?

A. Basically, the model starts off assuming that the economy is already optimal, and is already working the best that it can. When you assume that, then the inevitable outcome of any policy to intervene in the economy is, by definition, going to cost money instead of saving money. And of course, that’s not a logical outcome. These economists were assuming things like that renewable energy will always cost eight times more than fossil fuels, even 100 years into the future. They ignored all the benefits of avoiding climate change. Without any sort of evidence, they would say things like, “Climate change is not going to hurt the economy until around the year 2100.” They only add the costs of moving away from fossil fuels.

Q. Did anyone catch those errors in calculations back when they were done?

A. Some people did notice at the time. When I’m reading the historical record, I’ll sometimes see somebody like Florentine Krause, director of the International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths, say, “Hey, it looks like these models were designed to come up with this answer.” But these were lone voices in the wilderness. 

Q. We’ve been talking for years about science denial, and how companies like Exxon publicly denied the problem even when their own scientists were warning them of the changes underway. Why do you think the contributions of economists to this disinformation campaign have been able to fly under the radar for so long?

A. These economists weren’t completely alone in their approach. Charles River Associates was simply the preferred source for the industry. We might laugh at some proclamations in these economic reports, like that climate change is not going to hurt us until the year 2100. But what surprised me the most is that I found even more outlandish things said by prestigious professors at universities like Stanford, heads of departments, who themselves were getting a lot of funding from the oil and gas industry. They used their academic credentials to kind of launder their bad science.  

Q. Has the strategy changed or mutated in more recent years? Are the same economists  writing reports today like the ones you found in the 1980s and 1990s?

A. A lot of the consultants working on climate left Charles River Associates around the same time, and they ended up at NERA, or National Economic Research Associates. That was actually the firm that produced the report that former President Trump cited to justify leaving the Paris Agreement. So the firms change, and sometimes the people change, there are new people that get involved over time, and others retire. But the basic strategy has stayed largely the same for over 30 years now. 

Q. What do you think should be the main takeaway from these new findings?

A. For decades, economists have been inflating the cost of action, and downplaying the cost of inaction. And largely, they’ve been doing that based on an outmoded economic paradigm. Just because a lot of people have built their careers based on this approach, it’s not a good enough reason to keep doing it, if it’s hurting us.




[ad_2]

Original Post

37 thoughts on “How economists helped Big Oil obstruct climate action for decades

  • 10 October 2022 at 4:07 pm
    Permalink

    You could definitely see your expertise in the work you write. The arena hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.

    Reply
  • 23 November 2022 at 2:56 pm
    Permalink

    Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.

    Reply
  • 7 December 2022 at 10:08 pm
    Permalink

    Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do a little research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I’m very glad to see such magnificent information being shared freely out there.

    Reply
  • 21 December 2022 at 11:21 pm
    Permalink

    I not to mention my friends came examining the nice guides found on your web page and then instantly came up with a terrible feeling I had not thanked the web site owner for those techniques. My young men ended up certainly excited to read them and have now certainly been using these things. Many thanks for genuinely considerably considerate and for deciding upon variety of very good resources millions of individuals are really desirous to understand about. Our honest regret for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

    Reply
  • 22 December 2022 at 9:17 pm
    Permalink

    I’m impressed, I have to say. Really hardly ever do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you have got hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the difficulty is something that not sufficient people are speaking intelligently about. I am very comfortable that I stumbled throughout this in my search for one thing regarding this.

    Reply
  • 24 December 2022 at 11:07 pm
    Permalink

    Throughout this grand scheme of things you’ll get an A for effort. Where you actually lost me ended up being in the particulars. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct in this article. Having said that, allow me tell you what exactly did do the job. Your article (parts of it) is certainly quite convincing and this is possibly the reason why I am making an effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, whilst I can easily notice a jumps in reasoning you come up with, I am definitely not convinced of just how you seem to unite your ideas which in turn produce the actual final result. For right now I shall yield to your position however wish in the near future you actually connect the facts better.

    Reply
  • 29 December 2022 at 11:58 am
    Permalink

    I simply wanted to write a small word in order to thank you for all of the precious ideas you are giving on this site. My long internet search has at the end of the day been compensated with really good suggestions to go over with my companions. I ‘d tell you that we visitors are very endowed to dwell in a superb site with many marvellous people with helpful strategies. I feel somewhat fortunate to have encountered the web page and look forward to many more entertaining minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once again for a lot of things.

    Reply
  • 30 December 2022 at 12:16 am
    Permalink

    Good ?V I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Excellent task..

    Reply
  • 2 January 2023 at 12:53 am
    Permalink

    you’re really a good webmaster. The web site loading speed is amazing. It seems that you are doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a fantastic job on this topic!

    Reply
  • 16 January 2023 at 4:33 am
    Permalink

    Awsome site! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am taking your feeds also

    Reply
  • 9 April 2023 at 8:20 pm
    Permalink

    An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

    Reply
  • 10 April 2023 at 11:14 pm
    Permalink

    Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great website and I look forward to seeing it improve over time.

    Reply
  • 12 April 2023 at 10:51 am
    Permalink

    As I website owner I think the content here is very wonderful, thanks for your efforts.

    Reply
  • 14 April 2023 at 12:33 am
    Permalink

    Good day very cool blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your web site and take the feeds additionally…I’m happy to seek out so many helpful info right here in the put up, we’d like work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

    Reply
  • 16 April 2023 at 5:30 am
    Permalink

    I carry on listening to the reports lecture about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the top site to get one. Could you tell me please, where could i get some?

    Reply
  • 25 April 2023 at 6:09 pm
    Permalink

    I think this is among the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The site style is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

    Reply
  • 2 May 2023 at 11:25 pm
    Permalink

    Hello, Neat post. There is a problem together with your site in internet explorer, might test this?K IE nonetheless is the market chief and a large part of other folks will pass over your wonderful writing due to this problem.

    Reply
  • 23 August 2023 at 8:02 pm
    Permalink

    Terrific work! This is the kind of information that are supposed to be shared around the net. Disgrace on Google for no longer positioning this publish higher! Come on over and consult with my web site . Thank you =)

    Reply
  • 22 December 2023 at 5:39 pm
    Permalink

    Howdy! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.

    Reply
  • 20 January 2024 at 9:34 am
    Permalink

    What¦s Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & help other users like its aided me. Good job.

    Reply
  • 28 February 2024 at 5:09 pm
    Permalink

    Thanks on your marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will often come back down the road. I want to encourage that you continue your great posts, have a nice weekend!

    Reply
  • 19 March 2024 at 5:52 am
    Permalink

    Just desire to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is simply nice and i could assume you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please carry on the gratifying work.

    Reply
  • 1 April 2024 at 8:55 pm
    Permalink

    I am often to blogging and i actually respect your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and preserve checking for brand new information.

    Reply
  • 14 April 2024 at 9:43 pm
    Permalink

    Hey! I just wish to give a huge thumbs up for the nice information you will have right here on this post. I will be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.

    Reply
  • 15 April 2024 at 9:34 am
    Permalink

    I’d forever want to be update on new articles on this site, saved to my bookmarks! .

    Reply
  • 17 April 2024 at 4:24 am
    Permalink

    Appreciate it for helping out, good information. “Our individual lives cannot, generally, be works of art unless the social order is also.” by Charles Horton Cooley.

    Reply
  • 22 April 2024 at 5:39 am
    Permalink

    Magnificent site. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to several friends ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks to your effort!

    Reply
  • 22 April 2024 at 6:35 pm
    Permalink

    I am often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

    Reply
  • 5 May 2024 at 6:52 pm
    Permalink

    Ikaria Lean Belly Juice is a fast-acting weight loss supplement that is developed to incinerate stubborn fat.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *