EPA might finally regulate the plastic industry’s favorite kind of ‘recycling’

[ad_1]

One of the fossil fuel and plastic industries’ favorite “solutions” to the plastic pollution crisis may finally be coming under greater scrutiny from the federal government. 

Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, formally announced it was considering tighter regulations for pyrolysis and gasification — controversial processes that are associated with “chemical recycling.” Industry advocates have named these processes as key steps toward building a circular economy — one that minimizes waste — but environmental groups have called them an “industry shell game” meant to keep single-use plastics in production.

The problem, according to Denise Patel, regional coordinator for the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, or GAIA, is that most of what the industry calls “chemical recycling” isn’t recycling at all. Rather than turning used plastic into new plastic products, chemical recycling usually involves melting plastic into oil and gas to be burned — the process is sometimes called “plastic to fuel.” Not only does chemical recycling not contribute to a circular economy, Patel said, but it also releases greenhouse gases that exacerbate climate change and hazardous chemicals that harm frontline communities.

“This technology hasn’t been sufficiently regulated by the EPA,” Patel said, adding that oversight is urgently needed to protect public health and the environment.

At present, the EPA doesn’t have a consistent definition for chemical recycling or its constituent processes, let alone a comprehensive framework for regulating it at the national level. The EPA’s Clean Air Act guidelines for solid waste incineration set standards for some types of pyrolysis — a process that applies high heat to waste under deoxygenated conditions to produce oil, gas, and char — but not others. 

For instance, the pyrolysis of municipal waste must meet pollution standards — unless it takes place in a “plastics/rubber recycling unit” under certain circumstances. And for hospital and medical waste, the Clean Air Act says that pyrolysis doesn’t count as waste incineration at all.

What’s more, “the EPA has wavered,” said Jim Pew, an attorney for the nonprofit Earthjustice, by not enforcing existing emissions standards for all chemical recycling facilities, in part by issuing exemption letters that let facility managers off the regulatory hook. 

Advocates want the EPA to streamline this maze by categorically regulating chemical recycling as “solid waste incineration.” Such a move would help the EPA monitor and limit the release of hazardous substances from chemical recycling facilities — toxins like benzene, bisphenol A, and lead, which are associated with higher rates of leukemia, lung problems, and neurological damage, respectively. 

“It’s quite simple,” Pew said. “If you want to burn municipal waste, meet the Clean Air Act standards for municipal waste incinerators. If you want to burn industrial waste, meet the Clean Air Act standards for industrial waste.”

Industry groups including the American Chemistry Council, or ACC — whose members include ExxonMobil, Dow, and DuPont — have opposed the EPA’s proposal for new regulation. According to the group, chemical recycling is already well-regulated by federal, state, and local governments; classifying it as solid waste incineration would create “onerous and inappropriate” permitting requirements, “severely hampering” states’ ability to expand chemical recycling facilities.

Garbage heap in Indonesia
A landfill in Indonesia. Ninety-one percent of the plastic ever produced has not been recycled.
Oviyandi / Barcroft Media via Getty Images / Barcroft Media via Getty Images

That’s an unhappy scenario for the ACC, which has spent the past few years lobbying aggressively for the passage of state-wide chemical recycling bills. Since 2017, at least 14 states have passed policies to ease regulations on chemical recycling facilities, with six of those states passing bills and resolutions in the past year alone. New regulation from the EPA would override many of those bills, forcing states like Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Louisiana to regulate chemical recycling as waste incineration.

The industry’s argument for chemical recycling hinges on the insistence that it primarily converts post-consumer plastics into like-new plastic products. However, groups like GAIA have repeatedly shown that successful plastic-to-plastic chemical recycling is a rarity. According to a 2020 analysis from Greenpeace that looked at 52 chemical recycling projects touted by the ACC, fewer than half could reasonably be considered plastic recycling projects, and none showed promise of ever becoming commercially viable. Those that qualified as plastic-to-plastic recycling projects would only be able to process 0.2 percent of the U.S. plastic waste generated in 2017, the report said, calling chemical recycling a “bait-and-switch PR tactic” meant to create the illusion of progress.

“They’re trying to brand it as recycling, which is deeply offensive,” Pew said. “To say this is somehow good for the environment, that they’re making lots of plastic and then burning it.”

Patel noted that the EPA’s new rule-making action will not stop the ACC or its member companies from using the term “chemical recycling.” But if it forces them to comply with clearer air quality standards under the Clean Air Act, it could place greater regulatory hurdles on companies hoping to build these facilities in the first place. Critically, she said, it will draw attention to industry-backed state-level bills to expand chemical recycling facilities into local communities.

Advocates also have their eyes on federal legislation like the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act, which would, among other things, place a three-year moratorium on new chemical recycling and plastic production facilities. It was introduced by Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon in March and has been stuck in the Committee on Finance since then.

For the most part, experts agree that the underlying solution to the plastic pollution crisis is much simpler than ramping up chemical or even traditional recycling. Some small amount of plastic may always be needed, said Raoul Meys, a research associate focusing on chemical processes at RWTH Aachen University in Germany, and it will be critical to find ways to deal with that waste responsibly. But it is equally vital to stop producing so much unnecessary plastic.

“Reducing the demand for plastics in general,” he said, “that’s certainly the way forward.”

Editor’s note: Earthjustice and Greenpeace are advertisers with Grist. Advertisers have no role in Grist’s editorial decisions.




[ad_2]

Original Post

32 thoughts on “EPA might finally regulate the plastic industry’s favorite kind of ‘recycling’

  • 5 December 2022 at 6:59 pm
    Permalink

    But wanna remark on few general things, The website style and design is perfect, the subject material is really good : D.

    Reply
  • 25 February 2023 at 2:56 pm
    Permalink

    Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage? My blog is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would definitely benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Thanks a lot!

    Reply
  • 11 April 2023 at 12:11 pm
    Permalink

    Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

    Reply
  • 11 April 2023 at 6:17 pm
    Permalink

    Hello! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing many months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any solutions to prevent hackers?

    Reply
  • 14 April 2023 at 7:13 am
    Permalink

    Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any recommendations?

    Reply
  • 3 May 2023 at 3:22 am
    Permalink

    I’m noot sure how I cɑme onto it, howeνer іt’s
    an absolute blast! It’ѕ a wonderful, healthy fun tіme.
    Pictures аre gorgeous ɑnd lively. The pace іѕ fantastic even іf you’re older, so
    уou aгen’t killing yⲟurself to rush and hit everytghing іn tіme; but it’s not slow in any ᴡay.
    I’m tһoroughly enjoying tһe game aѕ I trу to figure ߋut mу objectives.
    Ꭲhe оnly negative Ι have to address іs tһe need t᧐o explaain goals
    upront and tһe items yօu’ll need tⲟ gather to play.
    Thіs will for ѕure bе a permanent game fоr me гight now.

    Reply
  • 6 May 2023 at 12:04 am
    Permalink

    There is evidently a bundle to identify about this. I feel you made certain nice points in features also.

    Reply
  • 11 May 2023 at 12:01 pm
    Permalink

    Game iѕ challenging and funn whіch I enjoy.
    It will be revealed ɑt the end οf the game ԝhat
    sports bettings уou’ve won, the poijts you’ve earned,
    andd numЬers u һave missed.

    Reply
  • 25 August 2023 at 2:16 pm
    Permalink

    I am glad for writing to make you understand what a cool encounter my daughter obtained visiting your web site. She learned a lot of pieces, not to mention what it is like to possess an ideal coaching character to let many more really easily have an understanding of specified problematic matters. You undoubtedly exceeded our own desires. Many thanks for giving those practical, healthy, educational as well as fun tips on the topic to Mary.

    Reply
  • 17 December 2023 at 2:15 pm
    Permalink

    I?¦ve been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website. Studying this information So i am glad to exhibit that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what I needed. I so much surely will make sure to don?¦t disregard this site and provides it a glance on a relentless basis.

    Reply
  • 11 March 2024 at 9:02 pm
    Permalink

    I like this web blog very much, Its a real nice spot to read and obtain information. “I’d better get off the phone now, I’ve already told you more than I heard myself.” by Loretta Lockhorn.

    Reply
  • 12 March 2024 at 12:02 pm
    Permalink

    Great tremendous issues here. I am very glad to look your article. Thanks so much and i am having a look ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

    Reply
  • 15 April 2024 at 1:57 am
    Permalink

    Wow, amazing blog format! How long have you been blogging
    for? you made running a blog glance easy. The overall look of your
    website is great, as well as the content material!

    You can see similar here sklep online

    Reply
  • 16 April 2024 at 11:09 pm
    Permalink

    Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any suggestions?

    Reply
  • 18 April 2024 at 2:03 am
    Permalink

    I just could not depart your web site before suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is going to be back often to check up on new posts

    Reply
  • 19 April 2024 at 6:58 am
    Permalink

    Puravive is a weight loss supplement that targets the root cause of weight gain issues in men and women.

    Reply
  • 23 April 2024 at 4:28 am
    Permalink

    I haven’t checked in here for a while because I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I will add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

    Reply
  • 26 April 2024 at 8:28 am
    Permalink

    Someone essentially help to make seriously articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to make this particular publish amazing. Fantastic job!

    Reply
  • 27 April 2024 at 4:31 am
    Permalink

    Greetings from California! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your website on my iphone during lunch break. I love the info you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, fantastic blog!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *